<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look at the Monster?</title>
	<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/</link>
	<description>all because of you, i haven\'t slept in so long</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MikeyG</title>
		<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>The "HO!" in Slusho! is obviously faked... and not even a good fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;HO!&#8221; in Slusho! is obviously faked&#8230; and not even a good fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icanseethings</title>
		<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>icanseethings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>that pic is a fake and its confirmed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that pic is a fake and its confirmed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulisnofun</title>
		<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulisnofun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>This pictuer must be fake because the monster in the movie is a lion.  Right?
(Yes.  I am only kidding!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This pictuer must be fake because the monster in the movie is a lion.  Right?<br />
(Yes.  I am only kidding!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enderandrew</title>
		<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>enderandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Even if the author didn't admit to the fake, I would hope that it would be obvious it is a fake.  Let's assume for two seconds the movie featured a flying monster (which contradicts all evidence that the monster is aquatic).

Said monster would be added in via CGI after the fact.  A real life set pic would simply show the sky was empty.  It isn't like they'd actually create a working flying monster for the movie, especially on the relatively low budget of 30 million dollars.

Still, this had people going for a while, even with the poor photoshopping of the Slusho sign into the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the author didn&#8217;t admit to the fake, I would hope that it would be obvious it is a fake.  Let&#8217;s assume for two seconds the movie featured a flying monster (which contradicts all evidence that the monster is aquatic).</p>
<p>Said monster would be added in via CGI after the fact.  A real life set pic would simply show the sky was empty.  It isn&#8217;t like they&#8217;d actually create a working flying monster for the movie, especially on the relatively low budget of 30 million dollars.</p>
<p>Still, this had people going for a while, even with the poor photoshopping of the Slusho sign into the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colt</title>
		<link>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Colt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stylevirb.com/first-look-at-the-monster/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>it may be a fabricated image, but its an old one, i remember seeing that about a year ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may be a fabricated image, but its an old one, i remember seeing that about a year ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
